<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Night vision video of slow UFO over Denver, Colorado</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/02/17/night-vision-video-of-slow-flying-ufo-over-denver-colorado/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/02/17/night-vision-video-of-slow-flying-ufo-over-denver-colorado/</link>
	<description>the latest UFO news from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bathtub</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/02/17/night-vision-video-of-slow-flying-ufo-over-denver-colorado/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bathtub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=2760#comment-706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or it&#039;s simply an aircraft coming in to land. Its light signature is too bright for the camera and night scope to handle and optical zoom makes things even worse. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a fake because I doubt this idiot has the technical expertise to create one. It&#039;s an attempt to pass off poor quality footage as something it clearly is not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or it&#8217;s simply an aircraft coming in to land. Its light signature is too bright for the camera and night scope to handle and optical zoom makes things even worse. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a fake because I doubt this idiot has the technical expertise to create one. It&#8217;s an attempt to pass off poor quality footage as something it clearly is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Impressed</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/02/17/night-vision-video-of-slow-flying-ufo-over-denver-colorado/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not Impressed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=2760#comment-695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of the worst fakes I have ever seen. The object appears highly pixelated and digitized, whilst the surrounding image is much smoother. It moves across the screen, as if programmed by an algorithm, and when it is to pass &#039;behind&#039; some tree branches, the camera snaps back, loses focus and becomes unstable. Even with the camera shaking around you can still clearly see that the object is in fact passing right in front of the trees when it is supposed to be miles up in the sky -obviously added after the fact by an unskilled amateur. The worst part is that the camera focuses back on the &#039;object&#039; when it appears to have cleared the trees, but then they realize that it still has to pass &#039;behind&#039; another branch so the camera swerves about and loses focus again to compensate. Lame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the worst fakes I have ever seen. The object appears highly pixelated and digitized, whilst the surrounding image is much smoother. It moves across the screen, as if programmed by an algorithm, and when it is to pass &#8216;behind&#8217; some tree branches, the camera snaps back, loses focus and becomes unstable. Even with the camera shaking around you can still clearly see that the object is in fact passing right in front of the trees when it is supposed to be miles up in the sky -obviously added after the fact by an unskilled amateur. The worst part is that the camera focuses back on the &#8216;object&#8217; when it appears to have cleared the trees, but then they realize that it still has to pass &#8216;behind&#8217; another branch so the camera swerves about and loses focus again to compensate. Lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
