Comments on: More information in the Rendlesham case https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/more-information-in-the-rendlesham-case/ the latest UFO news from around the world Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:52:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.1 By: will https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/more-information-in-the-rendlesham-case/#comment-199 Sat, 08 Jan 2011 01:13:49 +0000 https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1740#comment-199 You are right. Ancient Aliens erodes his credibility. It is a terrible show.

]]> By: Gil https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/more-information-in-the-rendlesham-case/#comment-192 Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:31:40 +0000 https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1740#comment-192 Even if they could get the rest of the notebook and carbon date it so that it was actually verified to be from the time of the incident, it still leaves the rather problematic fact that he received this code supposedly via telekinesis.

As if we don’t have enough problems gaining credibility already with people. I just find this so unfortunate that he chose this long to “come forward” and in conjunction with a pretty terrible TV series (ancient aliens) to release this stuff.

]]> By: John https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/more-information-in-the-rendlesham-case/#comment-178 Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:54:17 +0000 https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1740#comment-178 Yep, and the lack of information about the notebook is not helping the case at the moment. I hope that Mr. Penniston will release the rest of the contents and that a proper analysis is made of the ink and paper.

That said, I have a feeling we’ll be hearing a lot more about this new development.

]]> By: glennco https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/more-information-in-the-rendlesham-case/#comment-172 Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:42:06 +0000 https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1740#comment-172 just because billions of idiots believe in religion has nothing to do with other people wanting actual proof of all this. remove the religious sceptics and you are still left with a bunch of sceptics that are also probably sceptic about religion for the same reason. what you say makes no sense.

there are a lot of convincing people out there saying a lot of contradicting things over the last 50 years. from time travel to us just being one big old experiment to 20+ alien species on and around our planet and solar system.

i think believing everything you read is kinda dumb. especially when a lot of it makes no sense. like why would he download this message in the first place, he wasn’t meant to touch the ship, so why would there be a message waiting for him or anyone? was this their plan? just hang around waiting for someone to touch the craft. would they not broadcast it to everyone? if he downloaded anything, the chances the message would be anything useful is pretty slim.

but i agree 100% with your first paragraph. let’s wait and see what unfolds, it is still all pretty exciting.

]]> By: Sutorcen https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/more-information-in-the-rendlesham-case/#comment-170 Wed, 05 Jan 2011 07:46:19 +0000 https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1740#comment-170 @ Gil

Let’s just wait and see what they come up with. If we believe that Bentwaters did happen then we should give them some more time to decode whatever message they got.

@ sceptics

Jesus can’t be ferified as ever having existed yet billions believe in him.

So if you want to be sceptic, be sceptic about everything and not just UFOs and ETs.

]]> By: Gil https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/more-information-in-the-rendlesham-case/#comment-165 Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:50:55 +0000 https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1740#comment-165 I get that this is fun and intriguing, but fundamentally I think this is unfortunate. There is no legitimate discovery that can come from this, obviously it’s extremely odd that the notebook would surface after all these years.

Not saying this guy’s making it up, but there is no way this can be verified and honestly, it detracts from the overall high credibility of the Brentwaters incident and other witnesses, including Lt. Col. Halt.

]]>