<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get the Rendlesham UFO binary code here</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/</link>
	<description>the latest UFO news from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-178930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-178930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carol I&#039;m really interested in knowing more and would love to discuss this with you. And I am being serious. Hopefully you still monitor this email address. Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol I&#8217;m really interested in knowing more and would love to discuss this with you. And I am being serious. Hopefully you still monitor this email address. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-106121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-106121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been intrigued with the Rendelsham incident as I have had similar things come to me by mental telepathy.  This has been going on for years and have just now come to grips with it.  The things that are similar; binary going thru my head but have no idea what it is for; they are &quot;us&quot; only on a different planet, and they are &quot;time travelers&quot;.  So far no space ship incidents nor have I seen them - thank goodness.  The only reason I&#039;m sending this is to let you know there are others out there.  By the way, I do get &quot;told&quot; things continually, usually about current to be happenings and they are usually correct it&#039;s the timing that is the problem.  Please don&#039;t sent this on-keep it confidential if you can.  I have to lead a &quot;normal&quot; life and have a husband that would not understand.  Thank you...if I can be of help let me know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been intrigued with the Rendelsham incident as I have had similar things come to me by mental telepathy.  This has been going on for years and have just now come to grips with it.  The things that are similar; binary going thru my head but have no idea what it is for; they are &#8220;us&#8221; only on a different planet, and they are &#8220;time travelers&#8221;.  So far no space ship incidents nor have I seen them &#8211; thank goodness.  The only reason I&#8217;m sending this is to let you know there are others out there.  By the way, I do get &#8220;told&#8221; things continually, usually about current to be happenings and they are usually correct it&#8217;s the timing that is the problem.  Please don&#8217;t sent this on-keep it confidential if you can.  I have to lead a &#8220;normal&#8221; life and have a husband that would not understand.  Thank you&#8230;if I can be of help let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nunya</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-81906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nunya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-81906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh ya, one other thing I forgot to mention.  Using the formula above, one could assume that the coordinates were read backwards.  In otherwords,  I think the message was meant to be:

13131269W 520942532N

Who knows.  There are lots of different things that these 01&#039;s could be.  Maybe it&#039;s not even an 8bit system.  Maybe its 16, 32, or more and it&#039;s a shorter message like &quot;You die now&quot; rofl.  It could be anything really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh ya, one other thing I forgot to mention.  Using the formula above, one could assume that the coordinates were read backwards.  In otherwords,  I think the message was meant to be:</p>
<p>13131269W 520942532N</p>
<p>Who knows.  There are lots of different things that these 01&#8242;s could be.  Maybe it&#8217;s not even an 8bit system.  Maybe its 16, 32, or more and it&#8217;s a shorter message like &#8220;You die now&#8221; rofl.  It could be anything really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nunya</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-81905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nunya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-81905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally I think the coordinates are inaccurate.  I believe there are 2 extra digits in the N coordinate that dictate where the decimals are to be placed.  Why anyone would do this, I have no idea.  It makes no sense to me,  but it fits I guess.  Of the 6 coordinates that these numbers could be, I think this is probably the one that makes the most logical sense since it&#039;s based on a formula rather than just a guess and mythical stories.

520942532N 13131269W

There are 2 extra numbers in N.  So, remove those 2 numbers on the end.  They just happen to be 3 and 2.  Only one of the coordinates could possibly be 3 decimals, thus resulting in:

52.09425N 131.31269W]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think the coordinates are inaccurate.  I believe there are 2 extra digits in the N coordinate that dictate where the decimals are to be placed.  Why anyone would do this, I have no idea.  It makes no sense to me,  but it fits I guess.  Of the 6 coordinates that these numbers could be, I think this is probably the one that makes the most logical sense since it&#8217;s based on a formula rather than just a guess and mythical stories.</p>
<p>520942532N 13131269W</p>
<p>There are 2 extra numbers in N.  So, remove those 2 numbers on the end.  They just happen to be 3 and 2.  Only one of the coordinates could possibly be 3 decimals, thus resulting in:</p>
<p>52.09425N 131.31269W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddyporta</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-75574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daddyporta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-75574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under hypnosis, when asked who the craft belonged to, Penniston said to the effect that they were from the future, that they were &quot;us&quot;.  Think that we have only had technology for the past 100 years or less.  Think of where we will be 100,000 years from now.  500,000 years from now?  It would be amazing if we couldn&#039;t travel through time by then...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under hypnosis, when asked who the craft belonged to, Penniston said to the effect that they were from the future, that they were &#8220;us&#8221;.  Think that we have only had technology for the past 100 years or less.  Think of where we will be 100,000 years from now.  500,000 years from now?  It would be amazing if we couldn&#8217;t travel through time by then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-75095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-75095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The binary in the notebook is subject to &quot;noise&quot; (Random fluctuations that obscure or do not contain meaningful data or other information) by the fact that the message was conveyed by Penniston&#039;s spontaneous writing of a sequence of zeros and ones which he did not understand at the time were a code of any sort. He had no concept of binary code when he wrote down the numbers and it&#039;s likely the stream of consciousness which inspired him to write the exact numbers he did were hence subject to random noise. Sure, what he wrote didn&#039;t turn out to render a perfect message by your standards but it&#039;s still quite remarkable and nonetheless significant what has been gleaned from the data all things considered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The binary in the notebook is subject to &#8220;noise&#8221; (Random fluctuations that obscure or do not contain meaningful data or other information) by the fact that the message was conveyed by Penniston&#8217;s spontaneous writing of a sequence of zeros and ones which he did not understand at the time were a code of any sort. He had no concept of binary code when he wrote down the numbers and it&#8217;s likely the stream of consciousness which inspired him to write the exact numbers he did were hence subject to random noise. Sure, what he wrote didn&#8217;t turn out to render a perfect message by your standards but it&#8217;s still quite remarkable and nonetheless significant what has been gleaned from the data all things considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Encounter in Rendlesham Forest: The Inside Story of the World&#8217;s Best-Documented UFO Incident</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-74173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Encounter in Rendlesham Forest: The Inside Story of the World&#8217;s Best-Documented UFO Incident]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-74173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Get the Rendlesham UFO binary code here [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Get the Rendlesham UFO binary code here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Rogers</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-71633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buck Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-71633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I can see, the descriptions seem to allude to a future unknown Earth spaceship (something like Star Trek Enterprise)with the inscriptions &#039;Exploration of Humanity For Planetary Advancement&#039;. Could this mean that our future Earth astronauts in the year 8100 AD travelled back into time to 1980AD in Rendelsham, England and are trying to communicate with present day Earth in a language most known to all--English &amp; binary? We are being visited by NOT ancient astronauts but by FUTURE astronauts. It remains to be seen....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I can see, the descriptions seem to allude to a future unknown Earth spaceship (something like Star Trek Enterprise)with the inscriptions &#8216;Exploration of Humanity For Planetary Advancement&#8217;. Could this mean that our future Earth astronauts in the year 8100 AD travelled back into time to 1980AD in Rendelsham, England and are trying to communicate with present day Earth in a language most known to all&#8211;English &amp; binary? We are being visited by NOT ancient astronauts but by FUTURE astronauts. It remains to be seen&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking the Penniston Binary Code &#124;</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-69771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breaking the Penniston Binary Code &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-69771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] those pages public.  There have been efforts to decipher the code using ASCII, which has produced interesting results by translating the binary code into numbers and English [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those pages public.  There have been efforts to decipher the code using ASCII, which has produced interesting results by translating the binary code into numbers and English [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bleeker</title>
		<link>https://www.ufoeyes.com/2011/01/04/get-the-rendlesham-ufo-binary-code-here/#comment-41520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Bleeker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ufoeyes.com/?p=1692#comment-41520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow, it took those aliens no time at all to learn English AND decipher or GPS code PLUS its meaning.

Even more remarkable is the fact that anybody was able to get even one word translate from the binary code. It is just impossible.

The binary code was received as one sequence. When we look at our binary code BY CONVENTION we treat the code in groups of 8 (bits) (or depending on the hardware and the purpose of the code i.e. on HW level in groups of 4, 16, 32, 64,etc. But most commonly 8 bits per entity.

THis convention can not be determined since it is just one sequence of zeros and ones. Furthermore in case we by some miracle would know the convention, so how many bits to one entity i.e. character or number, it still does not make sense it is in English. And why would it be in English, if, for arguments sake we&#039;d say that we would be able to decipher it? Is the message addressed to us?

Are they so smart to determine our binary computer code and code tables (i.e. ASCII), and the English language but FAIL to send a clear message to us what the hell it is that they want? The message that is presented as the outcome of figuring out the meaning of the sequence does not make enough sense for us to figure out what they want.

Well, maybe it is us who are still not smart enough, but that makes them stupid for not anticipating that.

as for looking for signs in it like the numbers 666 and 33.: what convention are you using? just a mix of which ever fits to get the message you want, it seems. Come on people, this way you can make such a message mean anything you want it to.

But then again...
If you have no hobby and no spouse, why not.  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, it took those aliens no time at all to learn English AND decipher or GPS code PLUS its meaning.</p>
<p>Even more remarkable is the fact that anybody was able to get even one word translate from the binary code. It is just impossible.</p>
<p>The binary code was received as one sequence. When we look at our binary code BY CONVENTION we treat the code in groups of 8 (bits) (or depending on the hardware and the purpose of the code i.e. on HW level in groups of 4, 16, 32, 64,etc. But most commonly 8 bits per entity.</p>
<p>THis convention can not be determined since it is just one sequence of zeros and ones. Furthermore in case we by some miracle would know the convention, so how many bits to one entity i.e. character or number, it still does not make sense it is in English. And why would it be in English, if, for arguments sake we&#8217;d say that we would be able to decipher it? Is the message addressed to us?</p>
<p>Are they so smart to determine our binary computer code and code tables (i.e. ASCII), and the English language but FAIL to send a clear message to us what the hell it is that they want? The message that is presented as the outcome of figuring out the meaning of the sequence does not make enough sense for us to figure out what they want.</p>
<p>Well, maybe it is us who are still not smart enough, but that makes them stupid for not anticipating that.</p>
<p>as for looking for signs in it like the numbers 666 and 33.: what convention are you using? just a mix of which ever fits to get the message you want, it seems. Come on people, this way you can make such a message mean anything you want it to.</p>
<p>But then again&#8230;<br />
If you have no hobby and no spouse, why not.  <img src='https://www.ufoeyes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
